I heard secondhand that there was recently a big argument online 
about epidurals. My understanding is that women who were pro-epidural 
were piling on women who expressed misgivings about them. I didn't read 
it, but it got me to thinking about epidurals.
I have 
never had an epidural, but because of my labor history, I have never 
felt like I should take a side in the argument. Due to the nature of 
precipitous labor, epidurals are not really a reasonable option. I 
suppose I could have had one the two times I was induced, but it seems 
silly to stick a needle in my back to avoid an hour's worth of pain. I 
did have a dose of the narcotic Stadol when Grace was born.
 I despised it. It only made me incoherent and unable to cope with the 
pain. And that's my entire experience of pain relief during labor.
I watch these arguments unfold feeling like I do not have a right to 
voice an opinion. I feel like my experience is so outside the norm that 
my opinion would only cause eyerolling or resentment because, really, 
one hour labors aren't that bad. It is an unexpected tidal wave that 
crashes on you all at once, but then it's done.
I am 
inclined to say that I would never have an epidural. I don't generally 
take medicine when sick anyway. I suffer through head colds and fever 
and headaches and rarely take anything for it. This is just my nature to
 think it isn't so bad, that it is almost over, that if I go to sleep it
 will be better when I wake up. It isn't any long-developed character 
trait in which to take pride. As I type this I remember that as I get 
older, I have taken more ibuprofen for fever than I used to because I 
ache when feverish now whereas I never did before. Knowing this 
stubbornness about myself and apparent high tolerance for pain, I want 
to say that if my labors were of average lengths, I still would not get 
an epidural. The truth is that I have no idea what I would do if labor 
lasted for eight hours.
I have mulled on it for awhile 
and I have figured out why the topic of epidurals irritates me. The 
reason I get annoyed with the blase approach to epidurals is two-fold. 
First, they are not risk-free endeavors, but they are often presented as
 the no-brainer response to labor. 'Why would you want to feel pain when
 you could avoid it?' is the argument. But epidurals have drawbacks as 
well as benefits. There are complications, side effects, and unintended 
consequences from an epidural. Sometimes the benefit far outweighs the 
risk (hello, c-section) and sometimes the risk isn't worth the benefit 
(a one hour labor). I am not going to list all the possible reasons one 
might want or need an epidural, but they exist, there are many, and it 
is a blessing to have this kind of pain relief available. But to decline
 an epidural does not mean that one is a glutton for pain. It could mean
 only that for any particular woman, the benefit is not worth the risk.
The
 second and major reason I get irritated with overwrought discussions 
about epidurals is that American hospitals are run with epidurals being 
the default treatment for labor. The standard hospital procedures for 
childbirth in America require that women give birth in the most painful 
positions possible. Women are immobilized and strapped to machines for 
"safety." Safety from liability, mostly. They are poked and prodded and 
subjected to painful exams which serve little purpose except to satisfy 
the curiosity of the doctors and nurses. Women are routinely starved for
 hours at a time on the very slight chance they will need general 
anesthesia. They have their bag of waters habitually ruptured 
artificially to "speed things up" which dials up the pain level 
exponentially. Who is in such a rush besides the medical team? I suspect
 most people would prefer a longer, less painful labor for themselves if
 it was explained that the presence of an intact bag is a significant 
cushion to the pain. Women are put into bed on their backs where they 
have to fight against all the laws of gravity in order to deliver, but 
the doctor has a convenient chair and easy view. They are habitually cut
 to mitigate the problems borne of the ridiculous, yet expected birth 
position, and have to deal with the consequent stitches for weeks.  
Every
 coping technique and mechanism is routinely stripped away from women at
 their most vulnerable time and then the hospital asks, "Do you want an 
epidural?" Only the most stubborn decline. Childbirth should not require
 such stubbornness in order to have access to more humane birthing 
practices. We accept all the fallout and complications from epidurals as
 a normal consequence of childbirth, but it really isn't. We have a 
culture that fears birth in large part due to the conditions we are 
subject to while giving birth, but we don't recognize that the 
conditions can be changed.
I have had 
conversations, in the past, with women from Europe who thought the 
childbirth scenes in American movies were a joke. Nobody could possibly 
think the practices depicted were a good idea. Surely, it didn't happen 
that way in real life. They were gobsmacked when I explained that, while
 the movies were dramatized and somewhat absurd, the shell of the 
procedures were the same: the positions, the counting, the confinement 
in bed.
So while a skirmish in the Mommy Wars consists 
of one group of women declaring their superiority in their all natural 
childbirths, another group of women accusing the first group of being 
masochists and perhaps insane, and the rest of us trying to find our 
ways through the happy middle of those ideas, the medical community 
skates along mostly unnoticed in their culpability for creating 
conditions where such drastic pain relief is almost always required.
Childbirth
 is painful. There are not many ways around that basic fact. If hospital
 procedures were more humane, childbirth would still hurt. There still 
would be a need for epidurals and pain relief in many cases. The use of 
pain relief is not a failure on the part of the woman. But what could 
change is the cultural expectation, borne of fear from real experiences,
 that childbirth is so excruciating that the only reasonable response is
 to be numb from the waist down.  
 
2 comments:
I actually had an epidural for the first time ever with my fourth L&D back in February. I have a few friends who have had epidurals and absolutely loved them. I was not impressed by mine. It really didn't work that well, and for all the trouble it causes (staying in bed, being catheterized, slowing things down), I would say it was not worth it. I opted for it only because my labor was an all-nighter, and I'd been given pitocin to try to get my contractions to become stronger and more regular. Being exhausted in the middle of the night left me more afraid of the pain than I've ever been before. Having decent nursing care that helps keep you moving and managing pain is really important, and nearly impossible to find in a hospital setting. It shouldn't be that way.
Post a Comment